The Versatile ELT BlogA space for short articles about topics of interest to language teachers.
Subscribe to get notified of
|
The Versatile ELT BlogA space for short articles about topics of interest to language teachers.
Subscribe to get notified of
|
|
In a world increasingly shaped by automation, a natural question arises: whose work is safe? As artificial intelligence spreads into domains once thought untouchable—law, journalism, design—the anxiety isn’t just economic. It’s existential. What remains uniquely human? Jobs That Resist Redundancy While AI dazzles with data and automates the predictable, many roles remain future-proofed—not because they resist technology, but because they require what machines cannot replicate. 1. Embodied skill in unpredictable environments Electricians, plumbers, dressmakers, bakers, tailors, and mechanics work with real-world materials in messy, irregular settings. They rely on physical dexterity, local judgement, and years of hands-on intuition. 2. Relationship-based work Nurses, therapists, teachers, early-years carers—these roles are built on trust, emotional nuance, and the ability to read what isn’t said. 3. Ethical and civic judgement Judges, social workers, mediators—these jobs involve balancing values, not just applying rules. AI can advise, but not carry moral weight. 4. Creative and meaning-making professions Writers, musicians, visual artists—AI can generate, but not intend. Its work is clever, but hollow. Meaning still comes from lived experience. The through-line? These jobs are grounded in bodies, relationships, judgement, and meaning. They don’t scale easily—and they don’t obey algorithms. So What About Education? If some professions remain human because they rely on depth and presence, what of learning itself? Students can now ask AI to explain calculus, summarise a novel, or simulate a debate. The traditional gatekeeping of knowledge has shifted. But learning is not just about accessing information—it’s about internalising, connecting, and transforming it. Where AI Excels
For self-directed learners, this is transformative. AI becomes a patient tutor, ready on demand. But most students are not self-directed--not yet. They need structure, encouragement, modelling, and trust. They need to develop confidence and identity. AI cannot do this alone. Yet AI can support the teachers who do. In most systems, teachers are overworked, underpaid, and stretched thin across administrative, pastoral, and instructional demands. Here, AI isn’t a threat—it’s a tool.
Where the Nuance Lies AI can ask how a student is feeling. But it cannot care. It can mimic empathy, but not hold someone’s silence or worry about their wellbeing. That said, not all humans care either. Teachers and therapists are often trained to express concern professionally, even formulaically. But here’s the difference: a human can surprise you. They can falter, hesitate, or reveal real concern. AI cannot mean it. That’s the gap. The Human Thread If AI is used wisely, it can elevate education—not replace it. It can support the cognitive load while protecting what matters most: the fragile, powerful space where a student begins to believe they can learn, and that it matters. Because education is not just about filling a mind. It’s about shaping a person. And that still takes a human hand—and a human heart.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
To make a comment, click the title of the post.
Archives
October 2025
Categories
All
|